Skip to Content
News & Analysis at your fingertips.

We use a range of cookies to give you the best possible browsing experience. By continuing to use this website, you agree to our use of cookies.
You can learn more about our cookie policy here, or by following the link at the bottom of any page on our site. See our updated Privacy Policy here.



Notifications below are based on filters which can be adjusted via Economic and Webinar Calendar pages.

Live Webinar

Live Webinar Events


Economic Calendar

Economic Calendar Events

Free Trading Guides
Please try again
More View More
Do More of What Works and Less of What Doesn’t

Do More of What Works and Less of What Doesn’t

Ilya Spivak,
Top Trading Lessons
Top Trading Lessons
Recommended by Ilya Spivak
Top Trading Lessons
Get My Guide

The admonition that traders ought to let profitable bets run while cutting losing one’s quickly has long since entered the realm of the cliché. It is sound advice, nevertheless. Applying such thinking oftentimes distils to trade construction: you should have a better than 1:1 risk to reward ratio, we are taught over and over again.

Rightfully so. It seems odd to risk losing more in order to gain less. Such a consideration also lowers the burden of getting it right on any given trade. Consider: with a 1:2 risk to reward ratio – a stop-loss distance of 10 points and a target of 20 points, say – being right on just one out of every three trades breaks even, and anything better is profitable.

Nevertheless, overlooking this part of the process is one of the most common trading pitfalls. Investors routinely find themselves in situations where a string of modestly profitable trades is wiped out by one or two big losses. A difference of perspective is perhaps in order.

Trade Smarter - Sign up for the DailyFX Newsletter

Receive timely and compelling market commentary from the DailyFX team

Subscribe to Newsletter

This year, the routine annual review of my own performance seemed to suggest an interesting alternative. The headline statistics show a net return of 40.6 percent on 58 trades in 2021, of which 40 percent were profitable. That is, account equity grew by over 40 percent even as 6 out of 10 trades lost money.

How did this happen? The average winning trade made about 2.5 times more money than the average losing one gave up. Intriguingly, the average winning trade was also held for 4.7 weeks, while the average losing one was open for just 1.7 weeks. In other words, winners were held 2.8 times longer than losers.

Engineering a favorable risk to reward tilt seems more intuitive from this time-based angle: do more of what works and less of what doesn’t. Practically, this might mean that an already profitable trade deserves a bit of room to develop, or even merit scaling up. By contrast, a trade struggling to get above water may be cut quickly.

DailyFX provides forex news and technical analysis on the trends that influence the global currency markets.