News & Analysis at your fingertips.

We use a range of cookies to give you the best possible browsing experience. By continuing to use this website, you agree to our use of cookies.
You can learn more about our cookie policy here, or by following the link at the bottom of any page on our site. See our updated Privacy Policy here.



Notifications below are based on filters which can be adjusted via Economic and Webinar Calendar pages.

Live Webinar

Live Webinar Events


Economic Calendar

Economic Calendar Events

Free Trading Guides
Please try again
More View more
Guest Commentary: Is Standard and Poor’s a rating or a rumor agency?

Guest Commentary: Is Standard and Poor’s a rating or a rumor agency?

George Dorgan, Financial Analyst, and Portfolio Manager,,

As many readers of our blog know, we are not the best friends of the current Swiss National Bank (SNB) policy: we recently published a paper claiming that the SNB will go bankrupt and be bailed out by the tax payer. Our main reason was that in the next seven to ten years, inflation-adjusted foreign returns will be smaller than real returns in Switzerland. Excessive debt and the money printing policies of major central banks will trigger another run into the franc and one day the SNB will be overwhelmed by inflation.

The second biggest hedge fund of the world, namely the Swiss National Bank, will lose against the biggest hedge fund, namely the global conglomerate of the Swiss companies, that earns money everywhere in the world and repatriates profits back into the safety of the franc. See the part 1 of the S&P critique for this.

But what Standard and Poor's published last week on the SNB and for which it wanted news agencies to pay at least 400 US$, was not even worth a penny. We wonder why a rating agency, an institution on which so many investors rely on, is allowed to publish completely wrong numbers based on a very superficial analysis?

They said:

“Largely unnoticed, Switzerland’s decision to stem the appreciation of the Swiss franc has led to a de facto recycling of funds from the eurozone periphery to its core, via the Swiss National Bank (SNB).

While the SNB does not detail its foreign exchange holdings by issuer, we estimate that it has bought around €80 billion of bonds issued by the core sovereigns during the first seven months of 2012 alone.

The SNB’s eurozone bond buying during the seven months of 2012 is equivalent to about 48% of the combined full-year deficits we estimate for the eurozone core for the whole of 2012, up from 9% in 2011. In our view, this has significantly contributed to the declining yields on bonds issued by the core sovereigns during 2012.

(Source: Standard & Poor’s and FT Seeking Alpha.)

The SNB answer was the following:

The Swiss National Bank Tuesday said a report by rating agency Standard & Poor's on its holdings of euro-denominated government bonds contained a fundamental error. The report "ignores the sizable increase of SNB deposits with other central banks and international institutions which are published monthly by the SNB," the Swiss central bank said in a statement. "The conclusion by S&P that the Swiss National Bank has bought about 80 billion euros of government bonds of core euro zone countries is unfounded."(source)

S&P rejected the SNB rebuttal:

We stand by the conclusions of our report. Irrespective of the rise in SNB deposits with other central banks (which has risen by significantly less this year than bonds held by the SNB), our analysis and the SNB’s own data suggest a very substantial increase in SNB purchases of core Eurozone government debt in recent months. The SNB does not disclose the make-up of its bond holdings, but we believe the assumptions underpinning our analysis are reasonable. (source FT Seeking Alpha)

We did the calculations and obtained the following:

Guest_Commentary_Is_Standard_and_Poors_a_rating_or_a_rumor_agency_body_SNB_Purchases_Adjusted2.png, Guest Commentary: Is Standard and Poor’s a rating or a rumor agency?

Our result was 49.7 billion € in new European government bond purchases, a number far smaller than the 80 bln. € S&P claimed to see, but still higher than other sources.

Taking deposits at other central banks out of the reserve figure we got a new total of near €40bn while Credit Suisse estimated €30–35bn.

Either way, we are talking far less than the S&P’s €60bn-€80bn but not insignificant at all. (source FT Seeking Alpha)

We ask ourselves if Standard and Poor's is a rating or a rumor agency?

What would happen if they estimated German debt/GDP ratio at 140% instead of 90%, with a similar "insignificant" difference to the reality and downgraded Germany to junk ?

Standard and Poors' did a lot of other mistakes:

  1. Maybe S&P does not know it, but the SNB discloses some details about the purchased bonds. It publishes ratings and duration once a quarter (latest data here). It publishes ratings and duration once a quarter (latest data here).
  1. The rating agency compared the 10 years French government bond with Swiss currency reserves (see right side). It might be true that the Swiss started to buy French bonds, but the duration of newly purchased bonds were around 0.87 years (calculation in our detail report). Consequently total duration (including 70% of existing positions by end 2011) fell from 4.0 in Q1 to 2.8 years in Q2 (same source). Hence the SNB did not buy hardly any 10 year bonds in 2012, but only short-term notes, probably of core euro states with positive yields and not of Germany that saw negative yields.
Guest_Commentary_Is_Standard_and_Poors_a_rating_or_a_rumor_agency_body_SP-SNB-reserves-and-french-yields.png, Guest Commentary: Is Standard and Poor’s a rating or a rumor agency?
  1. S&P ignored the price change of existing SNB holdings as of end December 2011. We estimate that the SNB had gains of 5 billion CHF just because of bond price changes.
  1. The SNB bought bonds with the small duration of 0.87 or simply currency at other central banks. Price changes of the core European government notes with these durations were very small during 2012. The yield of the French 1-year BTAN changed from 0.24% at the end of 2011 to 0.02% at the end of July. Therefore a big price influence by the SNB can be excluded.
Guest_Commentary_Is_Standard_and_Poors_a_rating_or_a_rumor_agency_body_French_1_yr.png, Guest Commentary: Is Standard and Poor’s a rating or a rumor agency?
  1. Even the big rise in 1 yr. BTAN yields in January can not be justified by SNB purchases, because they sold only securities with a value of 3 bln. CH in January.
  1. Given that yields of these core European short-term bonds remained stable during the big SNB interventions between the middle of May and end June, indicates that the SNB might have back-stopped a fall in prices
  1. In the first week after the euro summit on June 29th, french 1yr. BTAN yield fell strongly, but the SNB reduced their weekly interventions from recent 18 and 10 bln. francs in June to 6 bln. CHF in the first week of July. The correlation between SNB purchases and french short-term yields seems to be low.
  2. The unchanged "A rating" share of 4% between Q1 and Q2 shows that the central bank bought italian government bonds with a value of at least 2 billion francs. Apart of Italy there are only the small countries Slovenia and Slovakia that have an A rating.
  1. "Other ratings" (below A) dropped from 2% to 1% in Q2. Therefore we reckon that the SNB bought hardly any Spanish bonds during Q2.
  1. If the SNB deposits euro cash at the ECB, then this money can be used for ECB refinancing operations and benefits the periphery. Moreover, these SNB funds to the ECB are sterilized.
  1. The SNB reversed its policy in July 2012. It increased cash until end June, but in July it reduced cash and bought government bonds. We think that some "insider information" from the ECB and the Fed let them know that OMT and QE3 were imminent.Buying notes of core European states at record-low yields and record-high prices was probably not very useful given that a certain inflation risk with QE3 was indicated. Till today the central bank would have suffered substantial losses because prices fell since July.Therefore we judge that they increased the share of "A ratings" (i.e. Italian bonds) from 4% to maybe 6% or 7% and other ratings (Spanish bonds) from 1% to 2% buying these peripheral bonds at record-low prices.The SNB will publish more detailed data about the SNB holdings in July and the whole third quarter on October 31st. Then our suspicion can be checked. Only our point 11 is a rumor, but it has at least a strong reasoning.
Guest_Commentary_Is_Standard_and_Poors_a_rating_or_a_rumor_agency_body_2-yr-under-1.png, Guest Commentary: Is Standard and Poor’s a rating or a rumor agency?

Government bond yields under 1% on July 18th

See our full report for more details.

A remark on the Swiss ability to defend themselves

Like usually, the Swiss papers and blogs managed to give only a very general rebuttal, namely that Standard and Poor's and others mix up reason (the euro crisis) and consequence (the SNB buys core European bonds). See the blog of the Swiss Banker's Association and Never Mind the Markets, the blog of the Tagesanzeiger.

Their response is as usual only in German to keep the Swiss public quiet, but not to defend the Swiss National Bank against the global public opinion. We are sure that with the time, the opinion of the global finance world will influence also the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Then the IMF will suggest that the franc is not overvalued any more and they will oblige the SNB to let the exchange rate fluctuate again.

Like recently in tax affairs the Swiss will obey to the American wish and international opinion and remove the floor.

By: George Dorgan, Financial Consultant and Portfolio Manager,

DailyFX provides forex news and technical analysis on the trends that influence the global currency markets.